The bane of gay gangsterism

04 Oct, 2015 - 00:10 0 Views

The Sunday Mail

Vukani Madoda The Sharp Shooter
If you did not feel a sense of pride and elation when President Mugabe told the whole world at the UN recently that “we are not gays”, then you are either not Zimbabwean or more appropriately, you are a poofter. And poofters are the ones that cry that the President squandered an opportunity to talk about the economy. He talked about it. He said the sanctions should be removed. It is the sanctions that are the problem.

The problem is not Lake Kariba or the condition of the roads or unemployment. It is the sanctions, stupid!
And you know what condition they are giving us to lift those sanctions?
They want us to implement so-called “new rights”, a sugar-coated term for “gay rights”.

Therefore, the issue of gays is right at the centre of our under-development and right at the centre of the problems in our economy.
The gay gangsters will not lift those sanctions unless we give them indecent rights that go against the very moral fabric of our culture as Africans.

They will continue to bleed our economy until we allow them to teach our children to lose their rectal virginity.
They want us to exchange our dignity for a few slices of bread and some candy.
There is no way Zimbabwe will bow to such vile conditions so that we become a glorified Sodom and Gomorrah.

President Mugabe is right — and until the end of days never think he will change his mind about his disgust of allowing gay gangsters to roam freely and indecently practise their abominable acts in our beloved and beautiful country.

If we were not a peace-loving nation surely we would have burned gays on a stake like they did with witches in Europe in the 1600s or we would have lynched them in a worse fashion than occurred to our kinsfolk from slavery right until a few decades ago.

One must always wonder why the West is radically warming up to the idea of gay rights and yet up until 1986, homosexuality was listed as a psychiatric standard reference classified as mental illness in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).
Homosexuality is a mental disorder but all of a sudden there is mind-boggling cheer-leading of this insanity.

What is worse is that very few leaders have President Mugabe’s bravery to stand up against such a malady which African’s are being forced to accept so that they receive aid and donor funds.

What is more puzzling is that President Mugabe is vilified by certain quarters of the media and civic society and yet he is not the first to condemn homosexuality while standing on the moral high-ground. A plethora of American Republican presidential candidates only recently ran over each other in condemning a Supreme Court ruling allowing gay marriages but their condemnations never made glaring headlines.

Former US senator Rick Santorum cited the Dred Scott decision in which an enslaved African-American man unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857.
Santorum said such a history was an indicator that the Supreme Court in the US has not had a perfect track record.

“Today, five unelected justices decided to redefine the foundational unit that binds together our society without public debate or input. Now is the people’s opportunity to respond because the future of the institution of marriage is too important to not have a public debate,” Santorum said.

Former Texas governor Rick Perry said America’s founding fathers “did not intend for the judicial branch to legislate from the bench”.
If elected US president, Perry said, he would “appoint strict Constitutional conservatives who will apply the law as written”.

Ohio governor John Kasich expressed disappointment with the decision and Ben Carson said he also did not agree with it and called on the US Congress to protect religious beliefs.

“I call on Congress to make sure deeply held religious views are respected and protected. The government must never force Christians to violate their religious beliefs,” he said in a statement. “To me, and millions like me, marriage is a religious service not a government form.”
Florida senator Marco Rubio wrote, “While I disagree with this decision; as we look ahead, it must be a priority of the next president to nominate judges and justices committed to applying the constitution as written and originally understood.”

Chris Christie, who is expected to announce his 2016 bid next week, said: “I don’t agree with the way it’s been done. I want to be clear — I don’t agree with the way it was done.”

Carly Fiorina, too, said the ruling is “only the latest example of an activist court”.
“I do not agree that the court can or should redefine marriage. I believe that responsibility should have remained with voters where this conversation has continued in churches, town halls and living rooms around the country,” she said.

And the most famous of the American Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump called it another example of “the Bush appointed Supreme Court Justice John Roberts” letting “us down”.
“Jeb pushed him hard! Remember!” he tweeted.
So what’s the fuss about President Mugabe condemning gays?

Why is it that when President Mugabe condemns homosexuality in no uncertain terms, there is a discomforting uproar which frightens me to think that there are actually more gays in this world than meets the eye.

When President Mugabe maintains his resolve to oppose any so-called “new right” based on homosexual ideology, immediately fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

Gay gangsterism has the worship of the devil in it and manifests itself in manipulating and exploiting well-known norms and values by trying to normalise the abnormal. A dignified man would rather die first than give up the very essence of his manhood.
All men are born dignified but some want to lose this dignity.

A principled man would never vacillate on this.
A principled man will remain steadfast and unflinching in his noble stance against the indignity of being a homosexual.
No amount of pressure from so-called civic society or human (read inhuman) rights groups can shake a principled man on a matter of principle.
Show me a gay gangster and I will show you where to discharge your guns.
Dubulaizitha!

Share This:

Survey


We value your opinion! Take a moment to complete our survey

This will close in 20 seconds