Focac aligns with AU’s vision

Focac aligns with AU’s vision

The Forum on China Africa Co-operation will include in its plan for 2016-2018, for the first time, a strong regional dimension in support of initiatives by the regional economic communities in Africa such as the Southern African Development Community. This aligns with the vision of the African Union’s Agenda 2063 for a united and inter-connected Africa.
Prior to the Focac Summit of African and Chinese leaders in Johannesburg, South Africa this weekend, a roundtable of experts addressed various aspects of China-Africa relations under the theme “New Journey of China Africa Friendship and Co-operation”.
In a paper presented to this roundtable, the Executive Director of the Southern African Research and Documentation Centre, Munetsi Madakufamba, explores the development of cross-border infrastructure networks.
We publish the presentation.
* * *
China-Africa relations go back a long way, but the inception of the Forum on China Africa Co-operation 15 years ago provided a more structured platform and practical direction for advancing co-operation.
Even with the introduction of Focac, practical economic and political engagement has remained largely a bilateral affair until 2012 when the dimension of African regional integration was added to the scope of multi-lateral cooperation.
It, therefore, comes as no surprise that China’s engagement with African sub-regional groupings is yet to be more clearly defined.
With both Africa and China acknowledging that weak economic infrastructure is hindering development of the African continent, what could be a better rallying point for defining and shaping economic and trade co-operation between China and Africa’s regional economic communities?
Since its inception in 2000, Focac, as a multi-lateral platform, has provided two main functions.
First, it has provided a platform to “strengthen consultation and expand cooperation within a pragmatic framework”, and second, to “promote political dialogue and economic co-operation with a view to seeking mutual reinforcement and cooperation”.
It is a partnership that has been mutually reviewed and strengthened over time, bringing about many notable advantages.
For example, in 2014, China-Africa trade reached more than US$220 billion while China’s direct investment in Africa topped US$30 billion.
According to the China-Africa Economic and Trade Co-operation (2013) white paper, Chinese enterprises completed construction contracts worth US$40,83 billion in Africa in 2012, representing 35 percent of China’s overseas contract work completed.
The white paper further states that Africa has been China’s second largest overseas contract market for four successive years.
Staggering as these figures may appear, they have mostly been achieved through bilateral efforts, limiting the scale and scope, and potentially leading some countries to be in competition with one another where co-operation through Regional Economic Communities (RECs) would have been the optimal strategy.
This is particularly so for infrastructure projects that could potentially be developed as cross border investments spanning more than one country — such as the road, rail and power projects along the North South Corridor.
The North South Corridor is already a development priority initiated by three African RECs: the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (Comesa), the East African Community (EAC) and Sadc.
It stretches between Durban, South Africa and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; involving eight countries in eastern and southern Africa (Botswana, the DRC, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, the United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe).
There is greater scope for Africa to optimise and utilise its partnership with China to the fullest by expanding the co-operation at regional and sub-regional levels.
While some of the infrastructure projects that are being or are to be developed by Chinese enterprises are already part of the expansive North South Corridor, they have hitherto been presented and costed as fragmented investments, thus, no doubt, increasing the risk per unit project and ultimately diminishing the value for money.
Among the potential role for RECs, for example, is that the tripartite arrangement involving Comesa-EAC-Sadc could co-ordinate, facilitate and, where necessary, mediate over the resource mobilisation and development of the North South Corridor.
There are many more advantages and, of course, challenges that come with upgrading China-Africa co-operation to the sub-regional level, particularly regarding infrastructure development.
Some of the advantages can be summarised as follows:
Better co-ordination, harmonisation and standardisation.
Standardisation is particularly important to allow for seamless infrastructure networks, for example, where building of rail is concerned which would allow the smooth flow of locomotives across borders.
Economies of scale that can also allow for spreading of the investment risk.
Strengthening African regional integration as a regional approach would provide obvious opportunities for up-scaling into, for example, the African Union’s Programme for Infrastructure Development for Africa.
Alignment with China’s vision and actions on jointly building the “Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road”, and with Africa’s vision of development through Agenda 2063.
A regional approach would provide better platform to draw from China’s development experience. China successfully administers development policy over a very expansive area, which is similar to Africa by historical, geographical and demographic comparison.
Some potential challenges that would have to be grappled with in upgrading China-Africa co-operation at the RECs level would mirror some of the same challenges that Africa is facing vis-à-vis regional integration.
For example, none of the RECs in Africa, while at different stages of integration, have advanced enough to have supra-national status with legal mandate to act on behalf of their member states.
What that means is that, while RECs such as Sadc can facilitate marketing of infrastructure projects, contractual matters still have to be dealt with at the level of individual member states.
Further, many African countries, while active members of RECs, are still struggling to shake off the influence of their former colonisers. Going forward, Africa should push an agenda for the development of cross-border infrastructure to attract new industries as the centrepiece of its relations with China at regional and sub-regional levels.
The many advantages include attracting large-scale Chinese investment while at the same time pushing closer to reality the long-standing aspirations of integrating Africa. The multi-lateral co-operation at RECs level is not intended to replace, but rather augment bilateral cooperation. —Sardc.net

7,281 total views, 1 views today